WitrynaIndirect comparison is often used because of a lack of, or insufficient, evidence from head-to-head comparative trials. l Naive indirect comparison is a comparison of … WitrynaSome authors have used a naïve (unadjusted) indirect comparison, in which the results of individual treatment arms between different trials are compared as if they were from a single trial. Simulation studies and empirical evidence indicates that the naïve indirect comparison is liable to bias and produces over-precise estimates. As such, the ...
Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison: Anchored example …
WitrynaArticle: Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Direct contra naïve-indirect comparison of clinical failure rates between high-viscosity GIC and conventional amalgam restorations: an … WitrynaNaive-indirect comparison, in contrast to direct comparison of the same data, generated a large inflation of the effect estimate, which is unacceptable and should be … tc room\\u0027s北浜店
間接比較各種隨機分派臨床試驗之治療效果 一種擴大利用實證資料 …
Witryna3 kwi 2009 · This naive or unadjusted indirect comparison has been criticised for discarding the within trial comparison, increasing liability to bias and over-precise estimates.2 In contrast to such a naive indirect comparison, the adjusted indirect … Witryna15 lis 2024 · A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of the Efficacy of Pegcetacoplan Using Prince Trial Data Versus Ravulizumab and Eculizumab in Complement Inhibitor … Witrynaoften presents a challenge to researchers. There are several methods for indirect comparisons of clinical outcomes. Most approaches, such as naïve and adjusted matching, use aggregate data from independent studies that have a common comparator. For example, researchers may compare studies of treatment X vs. … tc room\u0027s北浜店